Cuban cigars are loved all over the world, and any cigar connoisseur will actually swear by his Havana cigar to do anything extraordinary. Cuban cigars happen to be much bigger than standard cigars, which often makes smokers confused about how they can smoke such a bigger sized unit. However, although they are bigger in size, smoking them can be easy. Here are some useful steps to help you smoke these cigars.
Hold it properly
You have to hold it between your index and middle finger. As this is a bigger-sized cigar, you have to take care that it does not drop from your hands. Remember not to bite your Cuban cigar. This will make more amount of tobacco get in your teeth, leaving a bad taste in your mouth. It will also end up damaging your cigar. Cutting or biting a lot of the cap will make the cigar come off.
Light it well
It is preferable that you use a torch lighter. Briefly light the cigar’s foot, and rotate the cigar as you hold the lighter flame to it.
Draw small puffs
Drawing on a Cuban cigar means that you can puff too much smoke if you pull too hard. This is because these are bigger in size than normal cigars. When you take small puffs, you can avoid overwhelming smoke entering your lungs and choking on it. Although some smokers like to puff hard on a Cuban cigar, that is not advisable. As you continue smoking these cigars more and more, you will familiarize yourself with the kind of pressure that suits you the best. As a thumb rule, you should puff a good cigar only once every minute.
Smoke it properly
Do not keep holding a Cuban cigar in your mouth, as it will cause the saliva in your tongue to wet the cigar. While not holding it between the middle and index finger, hold it with the lit section pointed downward. It will keep your cigar lit, and help avoid relighting. If you relight again and again, the cigar will give you a too strong taste for your comfort. Put it in a cigar ashtray, and keep the cigar rested not on the lit end but on its side. Do not ash it too often as it can make the cigar burn very hot. It is best to tap the ash off when you find that the ash is around 1 inch long. Afterwards store it in a proper humidor for best usage later. …
You all must be aware that some countries in the world allow citizens to possess a gun only after, they have fulfilled the necessary requirements that are needed to own a gun.
However, there are many instances where licensed gun has been stolen and misused for illegal actions putting the law & order in the country at stake. We all know that such illegal actions must be stopped ensuring the law and order in the country must be maintained at the highest level. If you do not know what countries make gun safes, only few of them have done it to make sure that all citizens have a protective storage for their firearms and ammunition.
In order to make sure that the law is adhered in these countries, they have also given legal provisions to the manufacturers in their states to produce gun safes so that it is readily available to its people.
In many countries, there are strict rules & regulations about storing firearms in gun safes. In order to make sure that its citizens abide by the law the nation’s government also encourages its manufacturers to produce gun safes also called gun storage containers to ensure that gun safes are available to its local citizens easily. So, what countries make gun safes?
You all must be aware that United States known for its economic and military power. Likewise its cultural imprint spans the world. The U.S.A is one of those nations that have a gun storage law. This law has not been completely enforced in all the states. However, twenty-seven states have gun storage laws that are designed to protect children from accessing guns. Hence, we see many gun safe manufacturers available in the U.S.A that manufacture’s gun safes meeting international standards.
Unlike U.S.A, it has a firearms regulation from the year 1974, which is in the respect of security storage. It requires a person that is entitled to possess firearm or ammunition off any kind to store away any firearms in gun safes, also called gun storages, as per the regulation mentioned above. This country also encourages its manufacturers to make gun safes.
Even in Ireland, anyone applying for a gun license needs to have a gun safe, as per the firearms regulations from the year 2009. You can also find gun safes being manufactured there as well.
Well these are few of the countries that make gun safes. I believe this article is helpful for you to know “what countries make gun safes.”
Dog is man’s best friend. These brachycephalics or bulldogs (a short nosed and flat faced breed) with wrinkly face, overhanging jaws and playful nature endear to all. Though they appear lazy they are fairly muscular. They have sensitive skin and stomach and also have a tendency to put on weight easily. The best food for bull therefore needs to ensure that it is not fattening and at the same time takes care of their sensitive stomach and skin.
A bulldog reaches its full physical size at around 2-3 years of age. A fully grown bull dog reaches a weight of 40-50 lbs. a moderately active bull dog requires about 1358 calories where as an active bull dog would need 1451 calories per day.
Building bones and joints
The big built bulldogs with their stocky barrel chest and a propensity to put on weight need strong bones and joints. They also tend to overeat. Hence it is important that their food should have good balance to maintain their muscles, help build joints and bones. The best food for bulldog is nutritious and prevents weigh gain.
Bulldogs are very much prone to skin problems due to their thick skin rolls which can breed bacteria. They may also develop oily and dry skin conditions along with dermatitis caused on account of friction. Special attention needs to be paid to the food to include diet that helps maintain healthy skin. Make sure you use the best shampoo for your bulldog only! Best food for bulldogs include amino acids, vitamins, omega 3 fatty acids, etc to maintain healthy skin
Easy to digest
Bulldogs have a sensitive digestive system. If the food remains in their digestive track for a long period of time it could ferment and lead to flatulence with unpleasant smell. As bulldogs have flat faces, it is difficult for them to eat without inhaling air. This adds to the problem. The best food for bulldogs should have a good proportion of good quality carbohydrates, sufficient fibers and easily digestible proteins.
The best food for bull dogs has about 18-25% protein, around 5% fat and about 65-70% carbohydrates. Most products available in the market have the ingredients in this proportion. The food could contain roasted bison, roasted venison, deboned turkey, chicken by-product meal, debones salmon, sweet potatoes, blueberries, dried chicory roots, flaxseed, salmon oil, peas, dried egg product, brewers rice, wheat, chickpeas, lentils, etc.
Choose the best food for your bulldog based on weight, age and activeness. Bulldogs are cute and when they want something give this look that you simply cannot resist. Don’t get taken by their look and over feed them.
As the name suggests a mirror less camera works without the help of a mirror as opposed to a DSLR which has a mirror or a prism which acts as a mirror to reflect the images on to a viewfinder.
These cameras are also called DSLM or Digital Single Lens Mirrorless cameras. Because of the compact size, these are also called Compact System Camera or CSC.
Difference Between DSLR And DSLM
In the DSLR or Digital Single Lens Reflex camera, the light from the object passes through the lens and falls on a reflex mirror. This light falls on a reflex mirror which then falls on a pentaprism which reflects this light to the optical viewfinder or to the camera sensor. What you view through the optical viewfinder is the exact image which you will capture on the camera.
So, how do mirror less cameras work? Here the light is passed through the lens and directly falls on the camera sensor. There is no optical viewfinder in a DSLM. You can see the image on the electronic viewfinder. The electronic viewfinder gives you the exact image of what falls on the camera sensor.
Because of the absence of a reflex mirror and the pentaprism, a mirror less camera is much smaller and lighter. This is a big advantage when you are traveling with the camera. Another advantage of the mirror less camera is that every image will fall on the camera sensor thus giving you the advantage of seeing the camera settings like white balance, contrast etc. You can even have other settings overlaid on the viewfinder. This allows the photographer to see exactly what will be captured by the camera.
DSLR Vs DSLM
When you check how do mirror less cameras work, you find they are different from DSLR cameras. There are other differences too. A DSLM camera is much lighter because of the absence of a mirror and the pentaprism. It is also smaller than the DSLR cameras.
In a DSLR camera, the autofocus works by phase detection which works very fast. Earlier models of mirror less cameras used the contrast detection method which is slow. But the latest DSLM cameras come with both phase and contrast detection which makes the autofocus work fast even in low lights.
We have seen how do mirror less cameras work and the differences between DSLR and the mirror less cameras. Both cameras have their advantages and disadvantages while the mirror less camera scores on bulk and weight.…
To the masters of Bruno, Tuffy and so on and so forth, in this article, here is a list of the best diets for your dog. Dogs have been our pets and our faithful friends since the start of time. The body mechanism of Dogs is indeed very different from ours, hence their diet is also different and you need to get the best food for your dog which depends on the breed.
Beginner’s Choice for Best Diets for Your Dog
The dogs at their tender age when their paws are soft, can start to feed on milk and bread. With milk, the tender being will definitely acquire calcium and from bread, dogs will attain carbohydrates for energy to play, hop, roam about and definitely to jump high to catch hold of the Frisbees. Vegetables can be started after some days. Vegetables like potatoes and spinach can be given with a good serve of lentils as best diets for Dog.
Raw diet can even contain raw meat and some dairy products like Yoghurt. Raw diets help the dog to have higher energy, shinier and silkier fur and a much healthy and fit body and skin thus keeping your dog healthy. However, some veterinarians are totally against raw diet for dogs since veterinarians believe that raw meat contains bacteria and fleas which contaminate the food and can adversely affect the health of your dog.
Home cooked diet for Your Dog
Home cooked diet typically contains rice, bread, vegetables and all those food items which the masters’ family also consume on a daily basis. The veterinarians recommend more of home cooked food than raw diet because they believe that home cooked food is cleaner than raw diet and much more nutritious and also provide much more energy as they are rich in carbohydrates thus providing for better health of the dog. Therefore, it is basically a tug of war between Home cooked diet and Raw diet to be the best diets for your dog.
Dry diet for Your Dog
Pedigree, a ready-made food for animals, made by Pedigree Pet foods, a subsidiary of the American group Mars, is the most popular Dry food available for dogs in the market. Pedigree says to provide the dog with better digestion, healthier skin and overall development. So it is suggested by veterinarians for modern family dogs where homemade food cannot be made available regularly, as it appears to be a suitable substitute.
Diets which are a BIG NO for Your Dog
Grapes should not be given to dogs as it has been seen that in the long run grapes cause fatal kidney failure in dogs. Chocolates and candy a delicacy to humans are a big no for dogs as they cause fatal liver failure, it also causes coordination problems leading to severe health problems in dogs and in certain cases may even lead to painful death. Alcohols, coffee, tea should be kept at a safe distance from dogs for their healthy life since they can even draw your dog into coma.
These are some of the best diets for your dog to keep them healthy and fit.…
If you’ve ever built a product from scratch, you’ll inevitably have come up against the dilemma of whether to build it until you think its perfect before releasing it to users, or making a minimum viable product that ticks a few boxes and lets the users dictate the next iteration.
The latter is the approach we took with Ocqur, which is live blogging software that Ive been working on with Jonathan Frost and Andrew Fairbairn.
I’ve been overseeing the first round of user testing since we started building the service at the beginning of the year. Its been really educational and also thrilling to see it being used outside of our small circle, so I thought I’d post a few thoughts about lessons learnt and what were planning for the future.
Structuring feedback is really tough
Early testers of Ocqur have been giving us feedback over the testing period. Some emailed me their thoughts, others blogged or tweeted about it, but testers were also required to fill out a questionnaire Id written.
The difficulty in providing a useful arena for feedback lies in getting an equal balance of serendipity and structure that allows you to get specific metrics. For example you write a question that asks the tester Which feature is the most important for Ocqur? A, B, or C? What if theres a D that you havent thought of? The tester might have D in mind as the most important feature, but youre not giving them the option to suggest it.
I think I managed to get the balance fairly well so we’ve got a workable set of percentages and figures regarding questions that can be answered with a yes or no, as well as long form feedback thats the result of more free choice questions.
There is a gap in the market
When we set out to build Ocqur, we saw it as an opportunity to create a liveblogging system that was simple but powerful and married good design to nice functionality. A lot of the feedback we got from testers was that they were surprised and pleased with how simple the product was.
Ive had some people ask me about the comparisons to Storify, and how to differentiate it from their offering.
To ask that kind of question is to miss the point a little. Storify is a great tool I use it frequently. But its not what were after. Publishing a Storify as live requires the user to constantly republish the page (which doesn’t automatically refresh if you’re a viewer) and inevitably constantly notify viewers that updates have been made. It works so much better to collect thoughts after an event has happened.
We think that liveblogging shouldnt be as complicated as it has been in the past. We think the current offerings are either poor or unaffordable to the majority of bloggers, freelance and student journalists. Luckily at this early stage it seems like our testers felt the same.
People interpret features in different ways
The reason we decided to release to testers so early in development is because we didnt want to spend another 10 weeks building something only to find out that no one wanted it. User input at this early stage was vital.
At the same time, its interesting when testers throw up something that you really didnt think would be a big issue. For us this was being able to upload content from your desktop onto a live blog.
I have never done this, having worked with pretty much all the consumer liveblogging services out there. I tend to scrape content from various web sources, and if I need to take any photos from my phone for a liveblog I either post to Twitter or share to Dropbox.
But clearly our testers want this feature, and they’ve voted overwhelmingly with their feet.
So now the question is, what do they use it for? Documents? Audio? Video?
Asking users to rank the importance of desktop upload may seem fairly specific, but in reality people may have all sorts of ideas of why its important to them and what they actually want. To that end Im going to chat to those people who ranked it as very important individually and dig a bit deeper into why its an important feature.
We had an overwhelming response when we put out a call for testers over double the amount of registrations that we needed for the first stage. If you’ve signed up and haven’t been contacted this time round, don’t worry well be sending out another iteration of the software in the next couple of months and you’ll be the first ones to get your hands on it.
A big thank you to everyone who’s participated so far, were really looking forward to sharing our plans for Ocqur with you in the months ahead.…
As the evidence of wrongdoing came to light, News International, Rupert Murdoch’s company that also owns The Times, was unable or unwilling to police itself. This was a disgrace
For those who persist in the narrative that everything that Rupert Murdoch touches is inherently interlinked, the piece offered a solid riposte and made a several interesting arguments concerning the British press.
But it wasn’t really the content of the article that mattered. It was the timing.
Faces who made appearances at Leveson yesterday included James Harding, editor at The Times and John Witherow, editor at The Sunday Times. So the decision was taken to publish this leading article outside the paywall because it had direct relevance to events happening later in the day that concerned the paper. Look here for our best Winchester gun safe buying guide.
Today, the inquiry is hearing from The Times. This seems the appropriate moment to make clear to our readers the newspaper’s view on the future of the press.
By dropping the paywall The Times ensured that attention from readers (and potential customers) was maximised because the topic of press regulation has never occupied a larger space in the public mindset. Ive no idea of the traffic generated by the article, but its a surefire bet that its higher than usual in addition to increased social sharing on Twitter.
Whys this important? Because you can easily see The Times using this kind of leverage again in the future, and not just on leading articles.
Imagine something extraordinary happens in the Republican party primaries. The Times Nico Hines gets an exclusive. Rumour is all over Twitter, but Hines is the only one who has the story. Editors at The Times hit publish and put the article outside the paywall. It would follow that there’d be an avalanche of traffic to the article, not only because its unusual for a newspaper that operates an airtight paywall policy to allow free access, but also because of the strength of the story.
The acid test would be to see how many readers would then decide that The Times were producing the kind of journalism that they liked and stump up £2 a week.
This kind of approach would lend particular articles more weight in the modern times of disposable content, because those not paying would race to see what they were missing. If they deemed £2 a fair price for more content of the same quality, they’d become subscribers.
Without stretching the analogy too far its a bit like my relationship with the Frontline Club. Frontline organises excellent events with authoratative speakers on a range of topics covering journalism and current affairs. I go to its events, but I cant afford the membership fee. The content is good, but the pricing isn’t right for me.
If people deem what they see ocassionally slipping out of the Times paywall to be worth the price of entry (I can count the people I know on two hands who subscribe for Caitlin Morans columns alone) then this kind of tactic could well be a new way to attract loyal subscribers to their brand. And, just like at Frontline, members are loyal.…
Yesterday Brian Stelter reported that Tumblr, the popular blogging platform, is hiring two journalists. They come in the form of Chris Mohney, senior vice president for content at BlackBook Media and Jessica Bennett, a senior writer at Newsweek and the Daily Beast.
Traditionally a favourite online hangout of creative teens, journalists have got to Tumblr relatively late (it celebrates its 5th birthday this year), but what does the move to hire editorial staff tell us?
From Stelters piece:
Andrew McLaughlin, a vice president at Tumblr, said that in telling stories about its users, the company wanted Mr. Mohney and Ms. Bennett, the only two hires for the time being, to “do real journalism and analysis, not P.R. fluff.”
Looking at Tumblr as a city of 42 million residents and telling their story has very real benefits, both to users and advertisers. Reuters Anthony De Rosa has shed a bit more light on what Tumblrs content strategy might be in his interview with Bennett, where she says:
Think trend stories — the democratization of creation. Think on the ground: who are the teen tumblr users in a remote town in Ukraine, and how did they find the platform? Think big picture: how is social media changing the way we interact and engage? Think data: what can Tumblr users tell us about the current presidential race? The mandate is broad, and the format will go beyond the written word.
So is 2012 the year when players like Tumblr, Facebook and Google get into the content game properly?
In Facebooks case, its a maybe. The company has just hired Daniel Fletcher, a 2009 journalism graduate with previous stints at Time and Bloomberg to become their managing editor.
Hiring a journalist isnt a new thing for Facebook last year they hired former Mashable employee Vadim Lavrusik as their journalist program manager, tasked with building the sites reputation as a home for journalists. But this new hire seems like it could be closer to editorial whether its creating original content or smartening up Facebooks many corporate pages.
So what about Google? Larry and Sergeys employees always stay resolutely tight-lipped about whether Google sees itself as creating original content in future. Some clues may lie in how it seems to be shifting its purpose on the web.
One of Googles maxims is to organise the worlds information and make it universally accessible and useful. In simple terms, their search bar acts as a conduit to pass you on to wherever you wanted to go on the web quickly, efficiently, accurately. Now Google seems to be wanting you to hang around on its services, and bring them all into one place.
Its done this in three distinct ways.
First making logins and business accounts one and the same your email account will now log you in to all Google services.
Second Reorganising search to integrate with Google+ and allowing normal searches to crawl through Google+ accounts (unlike Facebook or Twitter).
Newspapers dream of knowing as much about their users as Google do.
If Google were to become a content creation company tomorrow, their recommendation system would be second to none, and their ability to dictate the flow of news would be unprecedented.
Of course Google doesnt need to take a step in that direction in order to continue to be monumentally successful, but the concept of Google producing their own content service rather than just serving up a platform isnt too hard to fathom given how much behavioural data could be fed into such a service.
If you look at trends and buzzwords in journalism over the last few years, its easy to see how they link up with Tumblr, Facebook and Google.
Tumblr thrives on curation, Facebook on community and Google on data. Given the trickle down effect to the journalism industry (tools like Storify becoming popular, community managers being increasingly in demand and the growing area of data journalism) it seems like any of these companies would find that they slot into the current ecosystem rather well.
Whether any news organisations would be pleased about that remains to be seen…
This is probably the most galling aspect of the policy. If an employee isnt particularly social media-savvy, then theres no harm in another journalist using Twitter and other networks to promote and share their content in a way that means itll get maximum exposure.
If I was the only person sharing my own work around Twitter, then it’d get very limited traction, and theres no harm in staff helping get extra eyeballs onto a colleagues piece.
Always pass breaking news lines to the news desk before posting them on social media networks
There is fundementally nothing wrong with this. If were acknowledging that Twitter is a medium like any other, and one that should sit alongside videos, blogs and audio reports amongst Sky News output, then it makes sense that it should be properly integrated with the news desk.
Communication with the desk is essential in order to make the news operation an efficient one. I don’t have a lot of experience with them, but I cant imagine the vast majority of news editors being too happy with a journalist breaking a story on Twitter and then strolling over and telling the desk about it a few minutes later.
Breaking news without context on Twitter holds little or no value for the journalist or his/her audience in itself. The value comes from using Twitter as the start of a narrative.
When I was covering the bomb blasts and shootings in Oslo, I started by using Storify to collect information and photos about events in the city centre. Then when people became aware of the shootings, I moved to turning my Twitter feed into one dedicated to covering new developments.
My follower count didn’t rise because I was constantly breaking new information on Twitter, but because I was able to organise it more efficiently into an understandable narrative than others covering it at the time. I didn’t retweet everything I saw, I thought carefully about how people following me would be able to easily understand what was happening.
Breaking news in itself holds little value were my parents really any the worse for getting the full picture of the London riots on Newsnight rather than watching it unfold in real time on Twitter?
Passing lines to the news desk before tweeting makes good sense in a large organisation because the news desk is the hub that controls their coverage. They can distribute information to correspondents, multimedia specialists and graphics teams.
The ego of a single journalist itching to grab a bit of social media limelight should be able to bow to the collective nature of a news operation in order to strengthen its overall coverage. As Martin Belam notes, being first really mattered when your rivals had a 24 hour print cycle before they could catch up.
If anything, this shows that Sky would like to step away from the never wrong for long tag that indicates theyre happy to be wrong as long as they correct themselves quickly.
The BBC are rarely quicker than Sky when it comes to breaking news, but hold far more trust because they seem to pride context and verification much more. Is it a bad thing that Sky want to move toward this model more? I dont think so.
Do not retweet information posted by other journalists or people on Twitter.
This is slightly more problematic, but I wouldn’t go as far as saying that its removing the social from social media. As a Sky News employee, I certainly wouldn’t have been able to cover Oslo or the riots in the way that I did if Id adhered to this rule.
However, if you look at the social media usage of many journalists, they primarily use it as a promotional, rather than as a news gathering tool. Sky News new social media policy does not stop journalists from seeking out sources on Twitter, or finding photos that can be later added to strengthen news coverage. There are lots of journalists with big followings on Twitter, but only a fraction of them seem to use social media to actually dig things out and add another aspect to traditional sources.
If anything, the whole debate seems to be a microcosm of the divide that often seeks to engulf any rational discussion about online journalism. That is, if you don’t agree entirely with the popular view of mainstream media persistently not getting it, then your’e old news, you’re irrelevant, or Victorian.
I think its important to understand that there are many shades of grey what works for Sky News wouldn’t work for Tech Crunch and vice versa. This policy is neither surprising nor as draconian as some commentators have implied whats more interesting will be observing if it becomes indicative of Sky News shift to a markedly different kind of news provider.…
Earlier this morning, Storify announced that they were releasing a free iPad app. I’ve downloaded it, and these are my first impressions.
The app works in landscape mode only. Getting to the login screen means typing in your username and password slightly confusing for me because Ive always logged in via twitter since the beta version. Having tried all the possible iterations of my twitter password I then had to do a password reset to my email in order to get in this might just be me being forgetful, but those of you whove associated your twitter account with Storify may also hit this problem.
Anyway once you’re in you get access to all your Storify stories in a nice gallery view. You can edit them all from here, but I thought I’d create a short story just for this review.
The page for composing your story is similar enough, with the familiar tabs of Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Flickr and browser links available for you to run searches in.
The only difference between the desktop version is that there isn’t a tab for Google content, which normally pulls out web searches, news and images. I never use that tab, but worth bearing in mind.
Once you tap on any of these, its very much like the desktop version. You can filter tweets by user, search and images, and the drag and drop interface makes it really easy to quickly create the story. Interestingly the iPad app also has one feature that the desktop version doesn’t the ability to tweet from your own account while inside the app.
I can see the iPad app being incredibly useful for a couple of reasons.
The first obvious one is conference use. iPads are already ubiquitous at conferences they’re better for tweeting and note taking than a smartphone without being as cumbersome as a laptop.
But because the iPad apps drag and drop interface is so intuitive, you’d easily be able to collect together content in the break between a conference session. Ive already written a few blog posts entirely in Storify, and I think this will only increase that trend.
The second obvious use is news coverage combined with mobile journalism. If you’re out and about covering an event with your smartphone taking photos, video, live tweeting, its now really easy to just sling an iPad in your bag for some post-event curation in a nearby coffee shop. Again, getting rid of that laptop.
Once youve finished your story, youre presented with the publish screen which thankfully has all the functionality of the desktop app publishing to Facebook and Twitter, and the ability to @ reply anyone whos been quoted in your story.
Maybe the announcement wasn’t as big as some people were expecting. It wasn’t an acquisition like some were predicting, but the Storify iPad app stands on its own two feet.
It has a few bugs (it crashed several times when swiping between stories) but thats to be expected from an app thats just been released.
In the long run thisll mean only good things for Storify capturing a particularly savvy audience of content creators while theyre on the move and giving people yet another reason to ditch their laptops in favour of an iPad when theyre covering events.
Heres my finished story that I made on my iPad in about 5 minutes:…